Skip to content

Free email delivery

Please sign up for email delivery in the subscription area to the right.
No salesman will call, at least not from us. Maybe from someone else.

Brasilian Atlantic and Amazonian Rainforests | Femi Faminu video

October 29, 2021

[Posted by Chuck Almdale]

Wondering just how long Femi Faminu has been coming to Malibu Lagoon, I searched through my email and found that she first appeared on 10/23/11 among the “new faces.” We first communicated by email about the 12/8/18 Back Bay Newport field trip, I mentioned her in that trip’s write-up as the only one to spot a Sora, and we sorted out the other rail sightings and photos. Since then we communicate in bursts: I help her ID a bird photo, she comments on (or corrects!) some posting of mine, we swap jokes and discuss trips one or the other of us have taken or will soon take.

We’re both rather introverted (yes, really), we both feel that introversion is not a defect, and we both love birds.

Once, after what seemed like the 15th photo of a small blurry bird which she had sent to me, I commented, “I hope you don’t become one of those people who takes endless photos and ID’s everything back at home.” “Too late for that, I’m afraid,” she replied.

Her photography has improved considerably over the years. Her photo last August of the Red-necked Stint was the only one I saw—including all the photos by all the eBirders—that caught the bird walking closely to and paralleling a Western Sandpiper, perfectly displaying their subtle differences in plumage, size, bill length and bill curvature.

Red-necked Stint and closer Western Sandpiper. Malibu Lagoon (Photo: Femi Faminu, 8-22-21, time: 11:08)

About this photo, Femi commented when she sent it to me: “I’m not sure if it’s helpful or a hindrance to have other (hopefully more familiar) birds in the photo to help with identification of our mystery bird.”

If I didn’t say so then, I’ll say it now: Yes. It definitely helps. It makes many ID problems much easier, especially the always difficult estimation of size, at which nearly everyone is far worse than they would care to believe.

I didn’t know until quite recently (last month!) that she also took films. After viewing this short YouTube film I contacted her for permission to put it on the blog. I think you’ll enjoy it. Part of the trip was at Rio Cristalino in the southern Amazonian Basin, an excellent, hot and humid birding spot I’ve visited. Her comments are below the link.


Brazilian people were very friendly. A lot of them speak English and are too shy to use it, however if they see you making an effort (by speaking lousy Spanish), they will do the same. Food at the lodges was pretty good. Food at the airports was like airport food the world over; pretty awful.

Key thing to note is that I requested that no playback of recorded calls be used to lure the birds which I was able to do because I had private guides. Both guides (Atlantic and Amazon) were quite anxious about this in the beginning but eventually they relaxed and were surprised by the number and ‘quality’ of species we did see. 

I missed flight segments both going and coming. Be wary of those ‘legal’ connection times which are nigh impossible to meet due to security checks, etc. To their credit, United re-booked me on the next available flights with minimal fuss. 

At the end of the film there is a complete trip list of birds, the great length of which will surprise most people because, as Femi writes above, they were found without the use of tape recordings.

Visualizing Climate Change | Analog Atlas website

October 27, 2021

[Posted by Chuck Almdale]

Our climate is changing. It’s been widely noted for years that 97% of climate scientist agree that climate change is happening.

Of these, 97% agree, explicitly or implicitly, that global warming is happening and is human-caused. It is “extremely likely” that this warming arises from “human activities, especially emissions of ” in the atmosphere. Natural change alone would have had a slight cooling effect rather than a warming effect

Wikipedia

Recent years has brought an increased level of certainty:

….A 2019 study found scientific consensus to be at 100%, and a 2021 study found that consensus exceeded 99%.

Wikipedia

So the level of certainty among climate scientists fluctuates between 97% and 100%. That seems pretty high, for scientists, who generally agree to disagree on almost anything, and publish their disagreements, but some cable and web news sites can always find someone who disagrees about climate change. Just don’t ask about their competence or expertise.


Here’s an interesting report from the U.W. Global Change Research Program.
Executive Summary – Highlights of the Findings of the U.S. Global Change Research Program Climate Science Special Report. Something to read over breakfast.

Global annually averaged surface air temperature has increased by about 1.8°F (1.0°C) over the last 115 years (1901–2016). This period is now the warmest in the history of modern civilization. The last few years have also seen record-breaking, climate-related weather extremes, and the last three years have been the warmest years on record for the globe. These trends are expected to continue over climate timescales.


Analog Atlas

A group of scientists at the University of Montana felt that we-the-people didn’t seem able to grasp just what’s happening.

I liken the challenge to describing a song to someone who has never heard it: “It is in the key of C and has 4/4 timing.” The description is factually accurate but fails to inform because it lacks context, emotion and the framing that a listener brings.

We can put climate change in context with a simple question: ‘Where can I find the climate of my future, today?’ For residents of Los Angeles, it’s the southern tip of the Baja California Peninsula.

Solomon Dobrowski: Quoted in Los Angeles Times Op-Ed 24 Oct 2021

I suggest you take a look at their creation: Analog Atlas
It’s extremely user-friendly. It will give you two locales comparable to your current locale; one if the average temperature goes up 2°C, the other for 4°C.

We selected the 2°C temperature rise and put in our northern San Fernando Valley locale. This map popped up. The distance is 1194 miles (1951 km) to the southeast.

Analog Atlas gave us this photo and described our current locale as: “…currently classified as a California coastal sage and chaparral ecoregion.” It’s not our backyard, but looks familiar.

Your future climate match (or analog) is García Municipality, Nuevo León, Mexico. Toggle between the photos to see how projected changes could alter the landscape to look more like García Municipality, Nuevo León, Mexico.

Under your selected future climate scenario [2°C increase], this could change to Chihuahuan desert.

Analog Atlas @ 2°C increase – Chihuahuan desert near García, Nuevo León, Mexico

Well, that looks…dry. And hot. I recognize ocotillo in there.

“Very warm days” = 86°F (30°C). “Very hot days” = 104°F (40°C).

Onward to the 4°C increase. The distance is now 595 miles (958 km) to the southeast,

Under your selected future climate scenario [4°C increase], this could change to Sonoran desert.

Good ol’ saguaro cacti. Elf Owls! Harris’ Hawk! I think that’s a Gilded Flicker nest hole in the closest saguaro cactus on the right.

Your future climate match (or analog) is Guaymas, Sonora, Mexico. Toggle between the photos to see how projected changes could alter the landscape to look more like Guaymas, Sonora, Mexico.

And there we have it. We can pick our desert and cacti of choice. Thanks a lot, everyone.

The most expensive bird in the world | YouTube Video

October 26, 2021

[Posted by Chuck Almdale, submitted by Alert Reader Lina Gallucci]

This bird topped the “11 most expensive birds” list I posted yesterday, so at least this particular expensive bird is for real.

A two-year-old Belgian racing pigeon called New Kim is about to set a world record of over $1.5 million at auction, the price even more exceptional because the bird is female, the online auction house said.

It seems that the Belgians and the Dutch are the most fanatical pigeon racers in the world, and will pay enormous amounts for a good ol’ Rock Pigeon. Why? Who can plumb the mysteries of the human heart. But it’s worth noting that it was the Dutch who—in the early 1630’s—were willing to pay 100,000 florins (or Dutch guilders) for forty tulip bulbs.

What’s a 1630’s florin worth, you ask? Very difficult to calculate the value in today’s dollars or euros. Here’s the cost of a few other items (Wikipedia) of that era:

  • A “tun” (930 kg or 2,050 lb) of butter – about 100 florins
  • A skilled laborer – 150–350 florins a year
  • “Eight fat swine” – 240 florins.

As they say, do the math.


Here’s a quickie history lesson on Rock Pigeons which I wrote a few years back, always worth a re-visit.

What About That Dove? – Sunday Morning Bible Bird Study I



Finally, here’s the next chapter in the Belgian racing pigeon saga, from your number one source of Belgian racing pigeon news, the South China Post.

11 Most Expensive Birds in the World | Luxury Columnist

October 25, 2021

[Posted by Chuck Almdale]

This come from Ron Orenstein via the BirdChat email service. Ron’s succinct and entirely apropos comment was:

“Can you say irresponsible? Or illegal?”

I was very surprised (aghast, dismayed) to see some of the birds on this short list. It doesn’t seem as if these are the 11 most expensive. Perhaps this is just something intended to annoy – clickbait nonsense. But still it’s probably something we all should be aware of. A trigger warning on this one.

Eleven most expensive birds in the world
LuxuryColumnist.com | 2021 | 2 minute read

Native Plant Landscaping & urban wildlife | Noriko Smallwood study presentation on Zoom

October 20, 2021

[Posted by Chuck Almdale]

Doing this study during the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic was not easy for Noriko Smallwood, but determination and energy got her through. I know this first hand, as our yard was one of her many study sites. Occasionally we’d peek out our window and spot her skulking around, counting birds and insects, especially our enormous numbers of harmless hover flies and delightful small native bees.

ScreenSnip

The Influence of native plant landscaping on urban wildlife in Southern California residential yards
Noriko Smallwood and Dr. Eric Wood | LASMMCNPS website | 12 Oct 2021

Noriko begins her program about 7 minutes in, and Q&A follows at the end.

From her introduction to the Zoom presentation on the website of the Los Angeles/Santa Monica Mountains chapter of the California Native Plant Society:

For my master’s research, I quantified the importance of native yards to wildlife throughout L.A. by comparing birds and insects in 22 native and 22 paired non-native yards. Additionally, I investigated the drivers behind these patterns and identified particular plants that were used by birds in greater proportion than their availability, indicating preference. In this presentation, I will share the results of my study and will provide recommendations for wildlife-friendly landscaping.

ScreenSnip

Website of the Los Angeles/Santa Monica Mountains chapter of the California Native Plant Society