Skip to content

Free email delivery

Please sign up for email delivery in the subscription area to the right.
No salesman will call, at least not from us. Maybe from someone else.

Reprise 19: The Tongva

May 26, 2020

Editor’s Note: Entry number nineteen in our parade of history is a blog series (link to part one) posting November, 2013, and is our second-most popular blog or page. We gave it a permanent page in September, 2015 due to ever-increasing interest from local readers. It seems to have become the go-to resource for local students doing research on our our local First Americans, with over 100 visits in the last month, despite the fact that all the schools are closed and the students are COVID-sheltering at home.  [Chuck Almdale]

**********************************************************************

This was originally a three-part series of articles on the Tongva people by Cindy Hardin, LA Audubon Director of Outdoor Education, including the Ballona Wetlands Education Program, and Jane Beseda, Director at Large, Santa Monica Bay Audubon Society.

Tongva Village

“Wiyot’s Children,” Gabrielino Indian Village of Sa-angna
Playa del Rey, California, Ballona Wetlands
(Painting: Mary Leighton Thomson)

Part I: The First Americans of Ballona—Origins and Daily Life

The Tongva First Americans, also known as Gabrielinos,  who populated the Ballona Wetlands area, arrived from the east when desertification made the formerly lush Great Basin a less hospitable place in which to live.  This westward migration occurred between 9,000 BPE (before present era) and 2500 BPE.  The Tongva are distantly related to the Comanche and the Hopi Pueblo indigenous populations.  Their name means  “People of the Earth.”

The Tongva inhabited the Greater Los Angeles area as far east as the base of Mount Wilson, 40 miles inland.  Their territory was bounded by Malibu to the north and Laguna Beach to the south.  They also occupied some of the Channel Islands, including Santa Catalina, San Clemente and San Nicolas.  You can still hear their language in place names such as Pacoima, Tujunga, Topanga, Azusa, Cahuenga, and Cucamonga.

The Tongva’s appearance and costume were distinctive.  The people were somewhat short and sturdy by European standards.  They were also lighter-skinned than the indigenous people further to the south in Mexico and Central America.  They had brown or reddish hair, and no baldness.  The Tongva washed their hair with urine to kill lice, and this practice might have accounted for their light hair color.  Some Spanish explorers wrote of them as the “blonde” people of the area.  The women used red ochre, a type of clay that is heavy in iron, as sunscreen.

Hair and clothing shown in photo of trading display. Photo" Bowers Museum Collection. Source: tongvapeople.com

Hair and clothing shown in display of trade goods.
(Photo: Bowers Museum Collection)

Women wore their hair loose and long.  The men also wore their hair long, but wound the top part into a bun, fastened with pins of bone or wood.  Only the men wore hairpins, as this was done to keep the hair out of their eyes when hunting or fishing.

Women wore knee-length skirts or front-and-back aprons of skins, grasses, shredded bark or strings made from yucca fiber.  During the warmer months, men went naked or wore loin cloths, and the children wore no clothing.   During cooler months, the Tongva wore garments and wraps of animal skins, often made of rabbit.  All went barefoot except when traveling in cactus country or rough mountain areas.

Tongva woman at her shelter covered with tule mats on the banks of Los Angeles River. Photo: Bowers Museum Collection. Source: tongvapeople.com

Tongva woman at her shelter covered with tule mats on the banks of Los Angeles River.
(Photo: Bowers Museum Collection)

The Ballona village site of  Sa’angna, is formally designated as Area CA-LAN-62.  The actual location is believed to have been east of the saltmarsh along the base of the Westchester bluffs in what is now Playa Vista.  At that time, Centinela Creek flowed freely and was a source of fresh water for the settlement.  The village of about 100 people was approximately 1500 feet long and consisted of several clusters of 4 to 5 houses, or kiiy (pronounced “key”), spaced 15-20 feet apart.  (Spelling variants include ki, pronounced “key,” and kich, pronounced “kish.”)   These houses, which the Spanish called  jacals, served mainly as sleeping quarters for an extended family.

The kiiy were dome-shaped and framed with bent poles.  The branches of the Arroyo Willow, which is still abundant at Ballona, were used to make the frame.  Tule grass, a type of bulrush found in freshwater habitats, was dried and used to cover the frame. Tules were also dried and woven together to serve as floormats inside the kiiy.  A hole at the top of the dwelling let out the smoke from a fireplace in the center of the structure.  The replica of a kiiy located at the entrance to Ballona wetlands is much smaller than the actual kiiy used by the Tongva, which were 3 to 4 times larger and served as sleeping quarters for an extended family.

The Tongva were a friendly tribe, paddling out to greet the first Spanish ships with gifts of nuts, berries, acorns, and seafood.  Conflict between villages over failure in gift-giving at ceremonies, abduction of women, poaching and trespassing, or hurtful sorcery sometimes resulted in war.  But the decision to go to war was taken very seriously, and all members of the community were involved.  Most conflicts were resolved by “song fights,” the days-long singing of insulting songs in vile language, accompanied by much stamping and tramping of the ground.

Tongva pictographs are very rare today, having been destroyed by the development of Greater Los Angeles.  There are paintings at a few sites in the San Gabriel Mountains and in the northwestern part of the San Fernando Valley, but none are public.  A replica of their rock art is on display at The Southwest Museum.

The purpose and function of Tongva pictographs may have been similar to that of the Luiseno, since both have diamond patterns and wavy lines.  Luiseno boys and girls painted with red hematite on rocks during their puberty ceremony.  During the ceremonies, sand paintings were created to illustrate the Luiseno conception of the universe, the night sky, sacred beings, and the spiritual component of the human personality.  At the end of the ceremony, the sand paintings were destroyed, and girls raced to a rock where they painted angular and diamond shaped designs.  Perhaps the young Tongva women also painted these symbols during their puberty ceremony.

Link to The Tongva page

See references at the end of Part III.

 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This Killer Fungus Turns Flies into Zombies | Deep Look Video

May 25, 2020

Something is growing inside that fruit fly in your kitchen. At dusk, the fly points its wings straight up and dies in a gruesome pose so that a fungus can ooze out and fire hundreds of reproductive spores.

This is another installment of the PBS Deep Look series. If no film or link appears in this email, go to the blog to view it by clicking on the blog title above. If the film stops & starts in an annoying manner, press pause (lower left double bars ||) to let it buffer and get ahead of you.   [Chuck Almdale]

Malibu Lagoon Reconfiguration – Six Years On

May 24, 2020

Last year’s news today!

From the full report

From two local newspaper articles:
In mid-September, 2019, The Bay Foundation and California State Parks released the Malibu Lagoon Restoration and Enhancement Project Final Comprehensive Monitoring Report (Year 6). The data indicates that the restoration project was wholly successful as assessed against project goals and success criteria.

“It’s very gratifying, and we’re very pleased with the results,” Suzanne Goode, natural resource program manager for State Parks, said in an interview.

Links to the articles

The Malibu Times
2013 Malibu Lagoon Restoration Declared a Success
Six years after the $6.6 million controversial project was completed, lagoon health has improved, according to the final report from The Bay Foundation and its partners.
By Jimy Tallal / Special to The Malibu Times, September 27, 2019

Santa Monica Daily Press
Final Comprehensive Monitoring Report of Malibu Lagoon Indicates Proven Success Towards Project Goals
By George Moreno and Julie Du Brow, Special to the Santa Monica Daily Press, September 23, 2019

Links to Original Documents

Final Comprehensive Monitoring Report of Malibu Lagoon Indicates Proven Success Towards Project Goals
Joint Statement of The Bay Foundation and California State Parks
By Julie Du Brow, The Bay Foundation and George Moreno, California State Park
September 18, 2019
PDF file, 3 pages.

Malibu Lagoon Restoration and Enhancement Project Final Comprehensive Monitoring Report (Year 6)
August, 2019. PDF file, 261 pages.
Prepared by: The Bay Foundation (TBF)
Prepared for: State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation
Authors:
Karina Johnston, Science Director, TBF
Melodie Grubbs, Director of Watershed Programs, TBF
Chris Enyart, Watershed Programs Coordinator, TBF
Rosi Dagit, Resource Conservation District of the Santa Monica Mountains (fish)
Dan Cooper, Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. (birds)

Executive Summary (from the full report)
The Malibu Lagoon Restoration and Enhancement Project was completed on 31 March 2013. This report assesses the post-restoration conditions of Malibu Lagoon across approximately six years of monitoring by evaluating a suite of parameters. An evaluation of post-restoration conditions, through detailed physical, chemical, and biological monitoring components has resulted in several overarching trends. The restoration project has been determined to be wholly successful as assessed against defined project goals, performance standards, and success criteria (Table ES-1) outlined in California Coastal Commission CDP No. 4-07-098 and supporting documentation, including monitoring plans. No supplemental habitat restoration and enhancement plan is recommended for the project.

A clear pattern in the water quality data indicates that lowering the lagoon elevation, creating a wider single main channel directed more towards the incoming tide, orienting channel configurations in line with prevailing wind patterns, and removing the pinch points (i.e.,bridges) led to an increase in circulation both in an open and closed berm lagoon condition. Vertical profile mixing was an additional water quality indicator of a well-functioning post-restoration system. California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) surveys were a good indicator of the consistently increasing condition of the post-restoration wetland habitat areas. Each component of the post-restoration monitoring program is summarized, below, along with the 5-year success criteria for each survey type and the criteria evaluation details or results (Table ES-1). Detailed analyses by parameter are in the subsections below the summary table and integrate each set of results and data across survey years. Summary conclusions can be found at the end of the Executive Summary and with additional detail at the end of this report.

When compared to pre-restoration data, post-restoration results show improved water quality, improved circulation, removal of dead zones and excess sedimentation issues, and a diverse native ecosystem resilient to impacts. This report contains detailed results and analyses for each parameter surveyed, including comparisons to pre-restoration data as well as trends across the entire monitoring period to track changes over time. These results show that the site is meeting the overall project goals.

[Posted by Chuck Almdale]

Field Trips of Yore: Malibu Lagoon Pre-reconfiguration Trip Report: 27 May, 2012

May 24, 2020

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

This is our last lagoon trip report before the scheduled start of the reconfiguration process, so we made a few changes to our usual trip report format.  We’ve put a bunch of scenery shots in, and the bird list compares the months of May across the past six years.  We’ll follow this format until after the project is

North channel view to west towards golf course (L. Johnson 5/27/12)

done; the data should be useful to compare during-project months to prior years.  I keep my count numbers as honest as I can; there’s never any attempt to jack any number up or down.  My obvious and mostly worthless prediction:  count totals and species diversification will drop during the project, then rebound.  No prediction how much the change will be.  This is like J.P. Morgan’s famous stock market prediction: “The market will fluctuate.”

The slideshow shows what the area looked like today, excepting Jim Kenney’s February scenic photo.  The lagoon outlet closed within the past 7 days; lagoon water level had risen so much that Snowy Plover enclosure fenceposts I’d stood next to 8 days earlier were now partially submerged.

Whimbrel on low tide rocks (J. Kenney 5/27/12)

The birds were pretty much what we’d expect for late May: a few migrant shorebirds (Whimbrel, Black-bellied Plover); some nesting birds (Mallard, Black Phoebe, Barn & Cliff Swallow, Northern Mockingbird, House Finch).  The egrets are developing a large heronry next to Starbuck’s in the shopping center: Great Blue Heron, Great Egret, Snowy Egret and Black-crowned Night Heron are all nesting there.  15 Heermann’s Gulls had arrived from their breeding grounds on islands near the southern tip of Baja California; they were all 1st-year birds.  One Belted Kingfisher perched on dead branches in front of Adamson House.  We found a pair of Black Phoebes feeding 4 fledglings near the Adamson Boat House, as well as a female Mallard with 5 fluffy ducklings.  No project activity is scheduled for this side of the lagoon.  We didn’t see the young Killdeer spotted a month ago: it’ll be full-sized and flying by now, but it won’t yet have adult plumage.

View from beach across lagoon (L. Plauzoles 5/27/12)

Picnic:  The usual June chapter picnic is canceled.
Our 10 a.m. Parent’s & Kids Birdwalk is canceled until the lagoon project is completed and the parking lot is again available.

Links: Unusual birds at Malibu Lagoon
Aerial photo of Malibu Lagoon from 9/23/02.
Prior checklists: July-Dec’11, Jan-June’11, July-Dec ’10Jan-June ’10, Jul-Dec ‘09, and Jan-June ‘09.

Comments on list below:  Of 75 total species appearing in May for 2007-12, no more than 62% of them have appeared on any one day, something to keep in mind if you wonder why what is there is much less than what could be there.  Species low of 39 in 2010 is 17% below the highs of 47 for 2007, 2008 & 2012, not a huge drop. The 2011 low in total birds of 413 is 66% (787 birds) below the high of 1200 in 2007.  Species making up most of this difference: Brown Pelicans – 549, Western Gulls – 109 and Heermann’s Gull  – 61 (total of 719 birds, 91% of total difference).
NOTE: Right column averages of less than 1 bird/month are shown in tenths; all other averages are rounded to nearest whole number.   [Chuck Almdale]

Malibu Lagoon Census 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012  
May 2007 – 2012 5/27 5/25 5/24 5/23 5/22 5/27  
Temperature       54-62 54-68 68-72  
Tide Lo/Hi Height H+3.4 L+0.1 H+3.7 H+3.76 L-.13 L+0.38 Ave.
Tide Time 0742 0801 1042 0638 0816 0844 Birds
Brant 4 7 2
Gadwall 6 8 12 12 3 5 8
Mallard 45 20 20 18 48 32 31
Surf Scoter 9 2
Red-breasted Merganser 1 2 0.5
Ruddy Duck 5 1 2 3 2
Pacific Loon 1 5 1
Common Loon 2 0.3
Pied-billed Grebe 3 3 2 3 2
Western Grebe 3 1 0.7
Brandt’s Cormorant 5 1 1
Dble-crested Cormorant 7 5 28 7 46 15 18
Pelagic Cormorant 1 0.2
Brown Pelican 630 231 70 124 81 265 234
Great Blue Heron 5 2 1 2 1 3 2
Great Egret 3 4 4 2 3 3
Snowy Egret 12 9 7 12 3 14 10
Green Heron 1 0.2
Blk-crwnd Night-Heron 6 10 2 3 4
Osprey 1 0.2
Cooper’s Hawk 1 0.2
Red-tailed Hawk 1 1 1 1 0.7
Peregrine Falcon 1 0.2
American Coot 25 6 32 8 25 30 21
Blk-bellied Plover 3 22 4
Killdeer 1 1 4 2 3 2
Willet 3 4 1
Whimbrel 4 1 20 4
Marbled Godwit 1 0.2
Black Turnstone 1 0.2
Western Sandpiper 6 1
Dunlin 1 0.2
Boneparte’s Gull 26 2 1 1 5
Heermann’s Gull 61 1 20 17 15 19
Ring-billed Gull 5 2 1 2 16 4
Western Gull 119 56 65 68 10 85 67
California Gull 1 95 8 4 18
Glaucous-winged Gull 1 1 0.3
Caspian Tern 7 61 15 25 4 6 20
Royal Tern 2 1 2 5 2
Elegant Tern 15 23 40 9 12 35 22
Rock Pigeon 8 2 6 6 8 2 5
Eur. Collared-Dove 3 1 0.7
Mourning Dove 1 4 6 1 2 2
White-throated Swift 5 2 1
Anna’s Hummingbird 6 2 2 1 1 2 2
Allen’s Hummingbird 4 8 6 4 5 5
Belted Kingfisher 1 0.2
Western Wood-Pewee 2 0.3
Pac.Slope Flycatcher 1 0.2
Black Phoebe 12 6 12 10 4 13 10
American Crow 8 4 6 4 3 5 5
Common Raven 1 2 0.5
Rough-winged Swallow 6 10 10 1 2 5
Violet-green Swallow 6 2 1 1 2
Barn Swallow 12 6 1 8 8 2 6
Cliff Swallow 55 40 12 12 31 12 27
Oak Titmouse 1 0.2
Bushtit 4 20 4 4 5
Bewick’s Wren 1 0.2
Northern Mockingbird 3 5 6 4 2 6 4
European Starling 20 20 2 3 40 45 22
Cedar Waxwing 32 5
Common Yellowthroat 4 2 2 3 2
Spotted Towhee 1 2 0.5
California Towhee 1 1 5 1 1 2
Song Sparrow 10 2 8 10 4 12 8
Red-winged Blackbird 20 6 4 2 10 7
Brewer’s Blackbird 2 0.3
Great-tailed Grackle 1 4 16 2 4
Brown-headed Cowbird 2 1 3 1 1
Hooded Oriole 4 1 1 1
Bullock’s Oriole 2 1 1 0.7
House Finch 10 3 8 6 8 8 7
Lesser Goldfinch 2 1 2 4 2
Totals by Type 5/27 5/25 5/24 5/23 5/22 5/27 Ave.
Waterfowl 57 38 38 37 51 42 44
Water Birds-Other 668 252 132 148 152 313 278
Herons, Egrets 26 25 13 16 6 23 18
Quail & Raptors 1 1 1 1 3 1
Shorebirds 10 1 5 5 5 51 13
Gulls & Terns 235 148 144 216 51 151 158
Doves 12 2 10 12 9 5 8
Other Non-Pass. 15 4 10 7 5 8 8
Passerines 176 139 79 106 131 127 126
Totals Birds 1200 610 432 548 413 720 654
 
Total Species 5/27 5/25 5/24 5/23 5/22 5/27 Ave.
Waterfowl 4 4 4 3 2 4 4
Water Birds-Other 5 6 5 7 3 4 5
Herons, Egrets 4 4 4 3 3 4 4
Quail & Raptors 1 1 1 1 3 0 1
Shorebirds 3 1 2 2 2 6 3
Gulls & Terns 7 9 7 6 6 7 7
Doves 3 1 2 2 2 3 2
Other Non-Pass. 3 2 2 2 2 3 2
Passerines 17 19 16 19 16 16 17
Totals Species – 75
47 47 43 45 39 47 45

Identifying Raptors

May 23, 2020
by

The Hawk Migration Association of North America (HMANA) was founded in 1974 and incorporated as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization in the State of New York.

Link to the HMANA website New To Hawkwatching page.

HMANA’s mission is “To advance the scientific knowledge and promote conservation of raptor populations through study, enjoyment, and appreciation of raptor migration.”

HMANA:

  • Collects hawk count data from almost two hundred affiliated raptor monitoring sites throughout the United States, Canada, and Mexico
  • Publishes the semi-annual journal Hawk Migration Studies, which includes seasonal reports on the migration and more
  • Provides HawkCount, a near-real-time international database of hawk counts across the continent
  • Maintains BIRDHAWK, a subscription-based email list
  • Is a driving force behind the Raptor Population Index (RPI), to promote scientific analysis of hawk count data

Contact HMANA at: info@hmana.org
28916 Millbrook Rd
Farmington Hills MI  48334

They have a handy Hawk Silhouette Guide, pictured below, useful when doing hawk watches.
You can print or download this guide from the PDF file on our blog.

On the HMANA website, they have various products, including:

If you find yourself especially attracted to eagles, hawks, kites, falcons or nature’s aerial cleanup crew, vultures, as many people are, they would love you to join. If you donate to them, you’re automatically a member.
[Chuck Almdale]

HMANA Hawk ID page 1

HMANA Hawk ID page 2