Free email delivery
Please sign up for email delivery in the subscription area to the right.
No salesman will call, at least not from us. Maybe from someone else.
The Bird Way, by Jennifer Ackerman | Book Review
By Femi Faminu
[Posted by Chuck Almdale]
During a casual conversation about notable books, my mention of a book by Jennifer Ackerman that I was reading at the time was deftly turned by Chuck Almdale into my writing a review of the book.

My introduction to Jennifer Ackerman was through another book of hers, Chance in the House of Fate: A natural history of heredity, which explores the influence of genetics in human behavior and her new book The Bird Way; A new look at how birds talk, work, play, parent, and think is written in a similar meandering yet logical style. Ackerman tackles several topics while seeking an understanding of life from the perspective of the birds themselves, drilling the answers down to the minutia of DNA and then taking a few steps back to view the same question from other angles.
Several of my questions as an amateur birder are addressed, for instance, do female passerines sing? Well, the short answer is, for various reasons, yes and no. And while we’re at it, vocalization is not limited to song, but bird language in both sexes includes calls, mimicry, gongs, whispers, chuckles, trumpeting and caroling at all times of day and night for myriad reasons. Get the picture?
Her answers to an initial question sometimes lead to more questions. Rather than providing simplified answers, Ackerman spends most of the book describing the wonders of Avian life, drawing parallels with humans and explaining how we differ. For instance, why they see colors we cannot and how some have a visual acuity that exceeds ours by such a significant degree that it is difficult to imagine.
Ultimately not all mysteries are solved, because the truth is, we just don’t know how birds perform a lot of the feats they do. I was still left with a deeper sense of wonder and appreciation for our feathered friends. Although we still don’t understand a lot of how or why birds do what they do, this should not reduce our enjoyment of their company, but rather make them appear more wondrous.
Griffon Vulture Saved by Drone
Worth a look – In Israel a drone was used to drop food to Griffon Vulture chick who had lost its mother.
This page is from the Vulture Conservation Foundation.
Chris & Ruth at Malibu Lagoon, 22 January 2021
[Posted by Chuck Almdale]

Sanderlings in formation – is revolution in the air? (Chris Tosdevin 2/24/21)
Chris and Ruth Tosdevin have been frequent visitors to Malibu Lagoon for many years, both on their own and on our regular SMBAS birdwalks. This is in addition to their leading (with Ken Wheeland) the birdwalk at Trippet Ranch in Topanga Canyon. Chris (alias “Chris the Brit”) shares a characteristic with nearly every British birder I’ve ever met, anywhere in the world, namely, they’re darned good birders.

Canada Goose in mid-honk (Grace Murayama 1/13/21)
It’s almost annoying. I wonder if it’s something about their school system? They notice things that most of the rest of us miss. Chris and Ruth have been on my last two impromptu “socially distanced birdwalks” at the lagoon, so when I landed in the hospital with a “busted gut” (not the official diagnosis), we asked them to take the monthly census. Birding with them is always a learning experience for me.

Pintail males (Chris Tosdevin 1/22/21)
In addition to that – of course – Chris is a very good bird photographer, and he has been kind enough to share many photos with us for many months now. Grace Murayama who, along with Larry Loeher, her co-maven of All Things Western Snowy Ploverish, also sends in many excellent shots, some of which follow.

Green-winged Teal male (C. Tosdevin 1/22/21)

A pod, a pouch, a scoop and a squadron of Brown Pelicans under the P.C.H. bridge.
When pelicans fish together, as do White Pelicans, they’re a fleet. (C. Tosdevin 1/24/21)

Every so often, Nuttall’s Woodpeckers come down out of the riparian areas upstream
and poke around the trees and large brush down at the lagoon. (C. Tosdevin 1/22/21)

Glaucous-winged Gulls are regular winter visitors to the lagoon.
Most of them are first-winter birds as is this one, but occasional a 2nd-cycle
or even an adult bird shows up. We also get small numbers of Western-Glaucous-winged
hybrids with varying amounts of black in the wing-tips. (C. Tosdevin 1/22/21)

This Turkey Vulture seems to have glommed onto
a really really dead-looking fish (G. Murayama 1/22/21)

Red-breasted Merganser females and young males look identical (to me) at this time of year.
In another month or two the males start to develop their alternate plumage.
(C. Tosdevin 1/22/21)

This Great Egret is exceptionally plumy for mid-winter. (C. Tosdevin 1/22/21)

Say’s Phoebe resting on his lookout rock (C. Tosdevin 1/22/21)

Western Snowy Plover g:y/g contemplate the wrack. (G. Murayama 1/22/21)

Marbled Godwit, at 18″ one of our largest sandpipers (C. Tosdevin 1/22/21)
The gulls and terns were apparently off feeding somewhere else, and instead of thousands they totaled only 119 birds.
Birds new for the season: Canada Goose, Nuttall’s Woodpecker.
Many thanks to photographers: Grace Murayama and Chris Tosdevin
The next three SMBAS scheduled field trips: Who knows? Not I.
The next SMBAS program: March 2, Changes in Bird Status in California’s Central Valley, with John Sterling, on ZOOM, 7:30 PM.
The SMBAS 10 a.m. Parent’s & Kids Birdwalk is canceled until further notice due to the near-impossibility of maintained proper masked social distancing with parents and small children.
Links: Unusual birds at Malibu Lagoon
9/23/02 Aerial photo of Malibu Lagoon
Prior checklists:
2019: Jan-June, July-Dec 2020: Jan-July, July-Dec
2018: Jan-June, July-Dec 2017: Jan-June, July-Dec
2016: Jan-June, July-Dec 2015: Jan-May, July-Dec
2014: Jan-July, July-Dec 2013: Jan-June, July-Dec
2012: Jan-June, July -Dec 2011: Jan-June, July-Dec
2010: Jan-June, July-Dec 2009: Jan-June, July-Dec.
The 10-year comparison summaries created during the Lagoon Reconfiguration Project period, despite numerous complaints, remain available on our Lagoon Project Bird Census Page. Very briefly summarized, the results unexpectedly indicate that avian species diversification and numbers improved slightly during the restoration period June’12-June’14.
[Chuck Almdale]
| Malibu Census 2020-21 | 8/26 | 9/24 | 10/21 | 11/23 | 12/22 | 1/22 |
| Temperature | 70-77 | 66-77 | 64-68 | 52-64 | 57-64 | 60-61 |
| Tide Lo/Hi Height | L+2.52 | L+3.05 | L+2.70 | L+2.17 | L+2.15 | L+0.86 |
| Tide Time | 0958 | 1004 | 0634 | 1135 | 1052 | 1223 |
| Snow Goose | 2 | |||||
| (Black) Brant | 1 | |||||
| Canada Goose | 8 | |||||
| Gadwall | 5 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 6 | 8 |
| American Wigeon | 3 | 30 | 26 | 8 | ||
| Mallard | 16 | 14 | 14 | 8 | ||
| Northern Pintail | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Green-winged Teal | 1 | 12 | 8 | 6 | ||
| Surf Scoter | 3 | 13 | ||||
| Bufflehead | 10 | 5 | 6 | |||
| Red-breasted Merganser | 9 | 12 | 1 | |||
| Ruddy Duck | 9 | 35 | 19 | 6 | ||
| Pied-billed Grebe | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Eared Grebe | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Western Grebe | 6 | 2 | ||||
| Rock Pigeon | 4 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 14 | 3 |
| Mourning Dove | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 2 | |
| Vaux’s Swift | 8 | |||||
| Anna’s Hummingbird | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Allen’s Hummingbird | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Sora | 1 | |||||
| American Coot | 48 | 118 | 287 | 445 | 110 | |
| Black Oystercatcher | 4 | 2 | ||||
| Black-bellied Plover | 66 | 102 | 91 | 30 | 10 | 25 |
| Snowy Plover | 26 | 27 | 42 | 28 | 22 | 21 |
| Semipalmated Plover | 4 | 8 | 4 | 1 | ||
| Killdeer | 7 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 14 | 20 |
| Whimbrel | 14 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Marbled Godwit | 3 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 10 | |
| Ruddy Turnstone | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
| Sanderling | 39 | 75 | 78 | 25 | 8 | |
| Least Sandpiper | 21 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 6 | |
| Western Sandpiper | 8 | 1 | ||||
| Short-billed Dowitcher | 2 | |||||
| Spotted Sandpiper | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Willet | 47 | 40 | 5 | 14 | 10 | 12 |
| Greater Yellowlegs | 1 | |||||
| Heermann’s Gull | 10 | 14 | 85 | 43 | 16 | |
| Mew Gull | 2 | |||||
| Ring-billed Gull | 10 | 65 | 15 | |||
| Western Gull | 98 | 90 | 21 | 53 | 34 | 30 |
| California Gull | 17 | 12 | 1 | 535 | 485 | 50 |
| Herring Gull | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Glaucous-winged Gull | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||
| Least Tern | 2 | |||||
| Caspian Tern | 1 | |||||
| Forster’s Tern | 4 | 1 | ||||
| Royal Tern | 11 | 12 | 3 | 5 | ||
| Elegant Tern | 221 | 1 | ||||
| Red-throated Loon | 1 | |||||
| Pacific Loon | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Brandt’s Cormorant | 1 | |||||
| Double-crested Cormorant | 18 | 43 | 16 | 108 | 28 | 85 |
| Pelagic Cormorant | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |
| Brown Pelican | 8 | 5 | 5 | 206 | 32 | 162 |
| Great Blue Heron | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Great Egret | 4 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Snowy Egret | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 23 | 10 |
| Black-crowned Night-Heron | 2 | |||||
| Turkey Vulture | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Osprey | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Cooper’s Hawk | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Red-tailed Hawk | 1 | |||||
| Belted Kingfisher | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Nuttall’s Woodpecker | 1 | |||||
| Downy Woodpecker | 1 | |||||
| Black Phoebe | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 1 |
| Say’s Phoebe | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | |
| Vermilion Flycatcher | 1 | |||||
| Loggerhead Shrike | 1 | |||||
| California Scrub-Jay | 1 | 2 | ||||
| American Crow | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 14 | 6 |
| Tree Swallow | 3 | |||||
| Rough-winged Swallow | 1 | |||||
| Barn Swallow | 20 | |||||
| Bushtit | 50 | 16 | 75 | 30 | 30 | |
| House Wren | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Marsh Wren | 5 | 3 | ||||
| Bewick’s Wren | 2 | |||||
| Blue-gray Gnatcatcher | 5 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Ruby-crowned Kinglet | 2 | |||||
| Wrentit | 1 | |||||
| Western Bluebird | 4 | |||||
| Northern Mockingbird | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||
| European Starling | 27 | 2 | 5 | 85 | 30 | 10 |
| House Finch | 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Lesser Goldfinch | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | |
| Lawrence’s Goldfinch | 15 | |||||
| California Towhee | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Song Sparrow | 4 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 3 | 3 |
| White-crowned Sparrow | 4 | 12 | 4 | |||
| Dark-eyed Junco | 1 | |||||
| Western Meadowlark | 25 | |||||
| Great-tailed Grackle | 2 | 2 | 8 | 3 | ||
| Orange-crowned Warbler | 4 | 2 | 1 | |||
| Common Yellowthroat | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 1 |
| Yellow Warbler | 2 | |||||
| Yellow-rumped(Aud) Warbler | 10 | 8 | 16 | 6 | ||
| Totals by Type | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan |
| Waterfowl | 22 | 18 | 17 | 125 | 106 | 53 |
| Water Birds – Other | 30 | 99 | 146 | 617 | 518 | 359 |
| Herons, Egrets & Ibis | 14 | 25 | 9 | 7 | 27 | 13 |
| Quail & Raptors | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Shorebirds | 197 | 248 | 229 | 175 | 127 | 114 |
| Gulls & Terns | 364 | 129 | 22 | 688 | 634 | 119 |
| Doves | 9 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 3 |
| Other Non-Passerines | 1 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
| Passerines | 152 | 79 | 135 | 170 | 126 | 72 |
| Totals Birds | 790 | 619 | 573 | 1808 | 1563 | 738 |
| Total Species | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan |
| Waterfowl | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 9 |
| Water Birds – Other | 4 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 4 |
| Herons, Egrets & Ibis | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Quail & Raptors | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Shorebirds | 10 | 12 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 11 |
| Gulls & Terns | 8 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Doves | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Other Non-Passerines | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Passerines | 15 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 14 | 11 |
| Totals Species – 98 | 48 | 51 | 48 | 62 | 64 | 50 |
Blog Post Controversy Resolved
Dear Members and Friends;
On January 13th we asked our members and the California Audubon Chapters for their opinions on the controversy resulting from our blog post of November 19th last. We have received responses from both individuals and chapters: some were supportive of our position, some were in the middle, and some were strongly opposed. However, a consistent theme from the chapters that responded was that we would help advance our shared goals if the 11/19 post were taken down. So we have done so.
Thanks to all who responded, and particularly to the chapters’ honest consideration that helped us to reach this decision.
For the Board
Elizabeth Galton, President, SMBAS
Plastics and other annoying ‘recyclables’
[Posted by Chuck Almdale]
If you’re like us, you tend to toss just about any clean plastic into the recycle bin. That turns out not to be the best practice. Here’s some common errors, adapted from a Discover Magazine article by Anna Funk in May 2020.
[NOTE: Don’t miss our companion piece “Recycling Reimagined” posted 18 March, 2021]

- Recycling something “just in case”: Recycling centers can — generally — get the useless ‘residuals’ out of the good stuff, but it takes time and then they have to toss it out. China — darn them — isn’t taking our surplus plastic waste anymore, and some U.S. cities are just incinerating it, sometimes to generate electricity. So you have to look for those ‘triangle numbers’ on the bottom, although your local recyclers may not want certain categories. And it has to be clean; that takes water. They don’t want disposable cups, gooey bottles, broken glass, oily food boxes, paper towels and chunks of food.
- Recyclables inside a plastic bag: They’ll probably toss out the entire bag, unopened. Dump the stuff into the bin, then put the bag wherever it belongs (or reuse it – hey, there’s an idea!)
- Reusable tote bags: Unfortunately, they almost certainly have a bigger energy/resources footprint than the grocery story plastic or paper bag. According to the Danish EPA, in order to equal —but not better! — a typical plastic bag’s resource impact, you’d have to reuse the following bags: paper or plastic reusable tote – 35-84 times, cotton tote – 7,100 times, organic cotton tote – 20,000 times.
- Organic cotton: It’s ‘organic’ largely because ‘un-organic’ GMO cotton resists bollworms, raising cotton yields 60-100%. Bollworms love organic cotton crops, and they literally eat up much of the product. Plus all cotton plants suck up a lot of water. So ‘organic cotton’ is one of those ideas that look great on paper, but not so hot in the real world.
- Buying new, more sustainable versions of stuff you already have: Anything, anything takes materials, time and labor to produce. Reuse, reduce, recycle. Even gas-guzzling clunkers can continue for many years to have a much lower resource impact that would a new car that runs forever on sunlight…or dreams.
- New cars: See above. A ton (literally), at the least, of material is needed to make a new car. That material came from somewhere — the ground, a forest, a laboratory, it didn’t just ‘fall to earth’ like manna from heaven. The Argonne National Laboratory says that a hybrid car will cancel out the materials footprint over the long run, which may be a lot longer than you’re used to. Forget buying a new electric car every three years. Or ten.
- Ride-sharing: In order to turn a profit, those Uber and Lyft drivers, between rides, are often driving around looking for riders. A 2018 study in Denver found that ride-sharing increases average miles driven by 84% per trip. So if you drive your own car to work 60 miles round-trip, your Uber ride will be chalking up 110 miles. Society-wide, that’s no free lunch.
- Assuming that vegan, organic, local or non-GMO is environmentally innocent: In addition to organic cotton #4 above, there are a lot of other miscalculations and unsupported assumptions. Almond milk? While its carbon footprint is smaller than cow milk, it takes over a gallon of water to grow one almond. Locally-grown food may travel shorter distances, but large batches from distant places can be much more energy-efficient. Growing under lights with piped water instead of sunshine and rain can negate your locally-grown resource footprint savings.
- Putting compostable/biodegradables in the landfill, not the compost bin: It may never biodegrade in a landfill. Bacteria and fungi need oxygen to work, and tightly-packed landfills are often anaerobically sealed with clay and plastic to prevent liquid seepage. Compost when possible.
Well…that’s a bummer. So much of our effort and good intentions gone to waste. No pun intended.
What numbers can be recycled in Los Angeles?
Plastics stamped with the numbers 1 through 7 can be recycled. You can find the numbers on the bottom of the container. Once again, make sure containers are rinsed out. Further, plastic planters, food and blister packaging can be recycled.
– According to SCPR (KPCC 89.3FM)
Here’s a couple of websites that address Los Angeles Recycling Issues
Public Works of L.A. County – Recycling Bins
County of Los Angeles – Home / Residents / Environment / Recycling


